An MMS thesis grounded in mixed-methods research with 80 respondents across MSME operators, investors, and students. The work proposes a stage-calibrated framework of 13 PE-derived value creation levers, applied by MSMEs themselves rather than only by PE firms.
The full thesis is embedded below — scroll directly within the document, or download it for offline reading. Mobile readers may prefer the full-screen viewer or the download.
Indian MSMEs form the backbone of the economy — employment, manufacturing output, and contribution to non-farm GDP — yet they sit largely outside formal private equity deal flow. Ticket sizes don't match, information gaps make conventional diligence difficult, and founder posture often resists the dilution and governance changes PE engagement requires.
The conventional response has been to ask how MSMEs can be made more attractive to PE. This study takes a different position. It asks how the documented value creation practices PE firms install in their portfolio companies — operational disciplines, governance changes, strategic choices — can be unbundled from PE capital and applied by MSMEs themselves, either through self-execution or through structured engagement of external advisors.
The central argument is that these practices are valuable independent of the capital that historically delivered them.
The study surveyed 80 respondents across three stakeholder segments: 27 MSME operators, 22 investors and capital providers, and 31 students and early-career professionals. Three findings anchor the framework's argument:
Only 15% of MSME operators name lack of capital as their principal growth barrier. The dominant constraints they identify are operational inefficiencies (41%) and weak financial planning — pointing to practice gaps, not funding gaps.
93% of MSME respondents are open to external strategic support, yet only 22% have actually engaged consultants or advisors. The gap between openness and engagement is one of the most actionable findings in the study.
91% of investors indicated yes or maybe to interest in curated MSME opportunities. The constraint at the MSME-capital interface is structural — missing vocabulary and process — rather than appetitive.
Asked entirely separate questions in different language, MSME operators and investors converge on a common diagnosis: execution layer weakness, lack of visibility and drivers, accountability issues, and operational inefficiencies. Both sides describe the same set of problems. The framework's contribution is a shared vocabulary that lets each side engage the other in a form that fits their respective decision-making processes.
The study's principal contribution is a stage-calibrated value creation framework that maps 13 documented PE value creation levers — operational, strategic, governance, and financial — to four stages of MSME maturity: Foundation, Emergence, Scale-readiness, and Mid-market.
The stage calibration is anchored to Greiner's organizational growth model and to what the study calls the substrate principle: each lever requires specific organizational substrate to operate on. A lever that creates value at the Mid-market stage may be ineffective or counterproductive at Foundation stage.
The framework has two modes of application:
The two modes directly address the 93%-vs-22% openness-engagement gap surfaced in the survey data — by giving operators a structured way to decide, lever by lever, whether to build or to buy the practice.
Case evidence in Chapter 4 grounds the framework in real Indian PE deals — including Kedaara & Advent's transformation of Manjushree Technopack, and Kedaara's work with Vedant Fashions — showing the levers operating at deal-level scale before their unbundling for MSME application.
The study is honest about what it does and does not establish. The sample is non-probability based; findings should not be generalized to broader populations. The MSME respondent set is weighted toward the smaller and lower-medium end of the sector. The investor sample is composite across multiple archetypes.
The questionnaire was designed to capture stakeholder perspectives, not to test the application proposition directly. The framework is grounded in convergent evidence — operator pain points, investor-identified gaps, and documented PE practices all pointing in the same direction — rather than in implementation data from MSMEs that have adopted it.
Direct testing through implementation research is identified as a future direction. The framework offers structure anchored in evidence and calibrated to context. Outcomes depend on execution, market conditions, and factors beyond any framework's reach.
The academic work in this thesis is the foundation of HEXVantage, an in-development platform that translates the framework into practical tools for MSME deal evaluation, performance tracking, and operational optimization. The thesis answers the question of why and what; HEXVantage takes up the question of how, in production.